Click on the picture
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Fools unite! Jesus is back!
Next time I am in Sydney, I must remember to grab a can of paint and a brush and head down to Waverton station.http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,21023886-5001021,00.html
For at this station, the misguided and the weak in our society are gathering to witness the result of years of poor maintenance. I think I should do my bit and give the platform a long overdue coat of paint.
Those whose lives are empty, requiring some kind of faith for fulfillment, believe that Jesus has returned in the form of paint, brick and filthy brake dust.
That's right folks, these nutters are up in arms, praising that fictional character Jesus as he appears before them just metres away from the railway tracks.
While we are on the subject of religious garbage, here is an article worth a read....
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21029153-7583,00.html
Yep. Them media journalists is smart.
About as pathetic as the mis-use of English in title of this post, (and throughout all my blogs), are journalists. Before reading the rest of my post, please read the offending article in here.....
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21035418-2,00.html
Now for some facts.
"Channel 7 reported that tyre debris tore a "huge hole", "three-metres long", in the jet's fuselage"
FACT:- If there were a "huge hole" in the fuselage, it would have been impossible for the aircraft to maintain a cabin altitude of approximately 8000ft. Above this altitude, passengers would require oxygen. This scenario is highly unlikely to have occurred, as the aircraft traveled SAFELY from Singapore to Frankfurt.
FACT:- If there were a "huge hole" in the fuselage, there would be catastrophic metal fatigue such that the fuselage would have torn apart mid flight, causing the aircraft to crash.
I do not know the full facts of this incident, however, it is highly likely that the "huge holes" sustained during the tyre blow out, were to the wing to body fairings. (See diagram from the Boeing website. The green areas would have sustained damage).
These are composite panels, mounted beween the fuselage and the wings to improve aerodynamics. They are made of materials such as kevlar and carbon fibre on most aircraft.
Damage to these areas do NOT pose serious danger to the airworthiness of the aircraft however, damage may increase drag and therefore, reduce fuel efficiency. BIG FUCKEN DEAL.
How do I know this? Because I work on these planes.
This is yet another typical example of journalists mis-reporting the facts.
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21035418-2,00.html
Now for some facts.
"Channel 7 reported that tyre debris tore a "huge hole", "three-metres long", in the jet's fuselage"
FACT:- If there were a "huge hole" in the fuselage, it would have been impossible for the aircraft to maintain a cabin altitude of approximately 8000ft. Above this altitude, passengers would require oxygen. This scenario is highly unlikely to have occurred, as the aircraft traveled SAFELY from Singapore to Frankfurt.
FACT:- If there were a "huge hole" in the fuselage, there would be catastrophic metal fatigue such that the fuselage would have torn apart mid flight, causing the aircraft to crash.
I do not know the full facts of this incident, however, it is highly likely that the "huge holes" sustained during the tyre blow out, were to the wing to body fairings. (See diagram from the Boeing website. The green areas would have sustained damage).
These are composite panels, mounted beween the fuselage and the wings to improve aerodynamics. They are made of materials such as kevlar and carbon fibre on most aircraft.
Damage to these areas do NOT pose serious danger to the airworthiness of the aircraft however, damage may increase drag and therefore, reduce fuel efficiency. BIG FUCKEN DEAL.
How do I know this? Because I work on these planes.
This is yet another typical example of journalists mis-reporting the facts.
Sunday, December 31, 2006
Stocktake sales are a fucken rort.
Well. 'Bout time I posted again. Today, I went shopping for some couch covers. $200 each at DJ's (geez.... thats half the cost of a new couch), so it was off to good old K-mart, Target and Big W.
The fun begins.
This is the time of the year when stores such as these hold big sales. Stocktake sales mainly. Lucky for me, Target had 30% off. Surprise surprise though, as with all these sales, there is only ever one of the size you want and one of each colour on the shelf.
This is intentional. It must be. K-mart had a similar sale and yes, you guessed it, just one of each size and colour available. Whenever there is a sale, I am sure these bastards remove all but one of each item, knowing full well that if someone needs two, they will be forced to come back later, once the sale has ended and buy the second matching item at full price.
The ONLY store that had more than one of each item, was Big W. No sale there today.
I experienced a similar thing once when shopping for T shirts.... they were about $30 each or buy two for $40. Various sizes and colours available... great until you start looking closer. All the "S" size were same colour. All the "M" a different colour. Yep. If your size happened to be "L", you could buy 2 blue shirts! If it were small, you could buy two green. Pricks.
K-mart, Target, and Big W (only because if you had a sale, you would pull the same stunt)... FUCK YOU!
The fun begins.
This is the time of the year when stores such as these hold big sales. Stocktake sales mainly. Lucky for me, Target had 30% off. Surprise surprise though, as with all these sales, there is only ever one of the size you want and one of each colour on the shelf.
This is intentional. It must be. K-mart had a similar sale and yes, you guessed it, just one of each size and colour available. Whenever there is a sale, I am sure these bastards remove all but one of each item, knowing full well that if someone needs two, they will be forced to come back later, once the sale has ended and buy the second matching item at full price.
The ONLY store that had more than one of each item, was Big W. No sale there today.
I experienced a similar thing once when shopping for T shirts.... they were about $30 each or buy two for $40. Various sizes and colours available... great until you start looking closer. All the "S" size were same colour. All the "M" a different colour. Yep. If your size happened to be "L", you could buy 2 blue shirts! If it were small, you could buy two green. Pricks.
K-mart, Target, and Big W (only because if you had a sale, you would pull the same stunt)... FUCK YOU!
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Stupid sunglasses
Speaking of irrelevant wankers with stuipid eyewear..... Back in June, whilst visiting London, I noticed that many girls, (and even some "metrosexual" guys), were wering completely ridiculously large sunglasses. The sorts of things that "rich and famous" women wore back in the sixties.
Unfortunately, now that summer is upon us down here in the Southern Hemisphere, it sadly seems the trend has caught on.
A word on these glasses.... THEY LOOK FUCKING STUPID!
Their sole purpose seems to be attention seeking. "Look at me, I am wearing fucking stupid sunglasses". It's the same as the kid with the 3ft high boot spoiler on his Hyundai, or the sluts that dance on "podiums" at nightclubs. Attention seeking fucks.
At least your fucked up fashion enables people to clearly see just how superficial and irrelevant you really are.
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
The most over-rated band in history
Yep folks. They played here in Brisbane last night. The most over-rated band in the universe. The most over-rated band of all time. 
Don't take my word for it, read about how pathetic this band is here
Brisbane transport even made buses free for the concert!! I am sure that was because the fans, being illiterate arseholes, would cause major delays when attempting to work out what coins to use to pay the fare.
Don't take my word for it, read about how pathetic this band is here
Brisbane transport even made buses free for the concert!! I am sure that was because the fans, being illiterate arseholes, would cause major delays when attempting to work out what coins to use to pay the fare.
Sunday, November 05, 2006
The loony left contradicts themselves once again.
As we finally start discussing the viability of nuclear power generation, the loony left, (arts students who will never work, are vegetarians, don't wash and honestly believe that homosexuals can have children), once again show their stupidity.
There are two elements of waste produced in nuclear power generation. A small amount of low level waste, which poses danger for only a few years. NOT a cause of "global warming". The second is a higher level waste... around a tonne a year only from an average sized power station. This must be stored carefully however, it does NOT cause "global warming" and will not poison the environment as claimed by the loonies.
No burning of fossil fuels, thus producing carbon etc. No destruction of trees of forests to make way for hydroelectricity. The environmental effects are extremely minimal compared to conventional power generation sources.
Australia has an abundant supply of uranium. Cheap, clean and efficient.
Chernobyl. Old technology. Built with complete lack of regard to safety. Russian. It cannot be used as an example of nuclear power being "unsafe"
The same loonies believe that electric cars are environmentally friendly.... but at the same time, the complain about the harmful effects of power generation.
Do they also consider the toxic waste of the batteries used in these vehicles once they are past their used by date.
No.
Because the loonies just wanna bludge, smoke pot and protest at every opportunity.
GET JOBS YOU LAZY FUCKS. HAVE A WASH AND STOP FUCKEN PROTESTING OVER SHIT YOU HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT.
There are two elements of waste produced in nuclear power generation. A small amount of low level waste, which poses danger for only a few years. NOT a cause of "global warming". The second is a higher level waste... around a tonne a year only from an average sized power station. This must be stored carefully however, it does NOT cause "global warming" and will not poison the environment as claimed by the loonies.
No burning of fossil fuels, thus producing carbon etc. No destruction of trees of forests to make way for hydroelectricity. The environmental effects are extremely minimal compared to conventional power generation sources.
Australia has an abundant supply of uranium. Cheap, clean and efficient.
Chernobyl. Old technology. Built with complete lack of regard to safety. Russian. It cannot be used as an example of nuclear power being "unsafe"
The same loonies believe that electric cars are environmentally friendly.... but at the same time, the complain about the harmful effects of power generation.
Do they also consider the toxic waste of the batteries used in these vehicles once they are past their used by date.
No.
Because the loonies just wanna bludge, smoke pot and protest at every opportunity.
GET JOBS YOU LAZY FUCKS. HAVE A WASH AND STOP FUCKEN PROTESTING OVER SHIT YOU HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
